counter for iweb
Website
Silicon Photonics

Published book, click here

« The Metaverse and the network | Main | Lockheed Martin looks to pooling and optical I/O »
Friday
Nov042022

Taking a unique angle to platform design

  • A novel design based on a vertical line card shortens the trace length between an ASIC and pluggable modules.
  • Reducing the trace length improves signal integrity while maintaining the merits of using pluggables.
  • Using the vertical line card design will extend for at least two more generations the use of pluggables with Ethernet switches.

The travelling salesperson problem involves working out the shortest route on a round-trip to multiple cities. It's a well-known complex optimisation problem.

Chris Cole

Systems engineers face their own complex optimisation problem just sending an electrical signal between two points, connecting an Ethernet switch chip to a pluggable optical module, for example.

Sending the high-speed signal over the link with sufficient fidelity for its recovery requires considerable electronic engineering design skills. And with each generation of electrical signalling, link distances are getting shorter.

In a paper presented at the recent ECOC show, held in Basel, consultant Chris Cole, working with Yamaichi Electronics, outlined a novel design that shortens the distance between an Ethernet switch chip and the front-panel optics.

The solution promises headroom for two more generations of high-speed pluggables. "It extends the pluggable paradigm very comfortably through the decade," says Cole.

Since ECOC, there are plans to standardise the vertical line card technology in one or more multi-source agreements (MSAs), with multiple suppliers participating.

“This will include OSFP pluggable modules as well as QSFP and QSFP-DD modules,” says Cole.

 

Shortening links

Rather than the platform using stacked horizontal line cards as is common today, Cole and Yamaichi Electronics propose changing the cards' orientation to the vertical plane.

Vertical line cards also enable the front-panel optical modules to be stacked on top of each other rather than side-by-side. As a result, the pluggables are closer to the switch ASIC; the furthest the high-speed electrical signalling must travel is three inches (7.6cm). The most distant span between the chip and the pluggable with current designs is typically nine inches (22.8cm).

"The reason nine inches is significant is that the loss is high as we reach 200 gigabits-per-second-per-lane and higher," says Cole.

 The vertical design showing how the pluggable cages are also stacked vertically. Source: Yamaichi Electronics, Chris Cole.

 

Current input-output proposals

The industry is pursuing several approaches to tackle such issues as the issues associated with high-speed electrical signalling and also input-output (I/O) bandwidth density.

One is to use twinaxial cabling instead of electrical traces on a printed circuit board (PCB). Such 'Twinax' cable has a lower loss, and its use avoids developing costly advanced-material PCBs.

Other approaches involve bringing the optics closer to the Ethernet switch chip, whether near-packaged optics or the optics and chip are co-packaged together. These approaches also promise higher bandwidth densities.

Cole's talk focussed on a solution that continues using pluggable modules. Pluggable modules are a low-cost, mature technology that is easy to use and change.

However, besides the radio frequency (RF) challenges that arise from long electrical traces, the I/O density of pluggables is limited due to the size of the connector, while placing up to 36 pluggables on the 1 rack unit-high (1RU) front panel obstructs the airflow used for cooling.

 

Platform design

Ethernet switch chips double their capacity every two years. Their power consumption is also rising; Broadcom's latest Tomahawk 5 consumes 500W

The power supply a data centre can feed to each platform has an upper limit. It means fewer cards can be added to a platform if the power consumed per card continues to grow.

The average power dissipation per rack is 16kW, and the limit is around 32kW, says Cole. This refers to when air cooling is used, not liquid cooling.  

He cites some examples.

A rack of Broadcom's 12.8-terabit Tomahawk 3 switch chip - either with 32, 1RU or 16, 2RU cards with two chips per card - and associated pluggable optics consume over 30kW.

A 25.6-terabit Tomahawk 4-based chassis supports 16 line cards and consumes 28kW. However, using the recently announced Tomahawk 5, only eight cards can be supported, consuming 27KW.

"The takeaway is that rack densities are limited by power dissipation rather than the line card's rack unit [measure]," says Cole.

 

Chassis examples showing two horizontal line card configurations compared to using the 4RU, 2-ASIC vertical line card. Source: Yamaichi Electronics, Chris Cole.

 

Vertical line card

The vertical line card design is 4RU high. Each card supports two ASICs on one side and 64 cages for the OSFP modules on the other.

A 32RU chassis can thus support eight vertical cards or 16 ASICs, equivalent to the chassis with 16 horizontal 2RU line cards.

The airflow for the ASICs is improved, enabling more moderate air fans to be used compared to 1RU or 2RU horizontal card chassis designs. There is also airflow across the modules.

"The key change in the architecture is the change from a horizontal card to a vertical card while maintaining the pluggable orientation," says Cole.

As stated, the maximum distance between an ASIC and the pluggables is reduced to three inches, but Cole says the modules can be arranged around the ASIC to minimise the length to 2.5 inches.

Alternatively, if the height of the vertical card is an issue, a 3RU card can be used instead, which results in a maximum trace length of 3.5 inches. "[In this case], we don't have dedicated air intakes for the CPU," notes Cole.

Cole also mentioned the option of a 3RU vertical card that houses one ASIC and 64 OSFP modules. This would be suitable for the Tomahawk 5. However, here the maximum trace length is five inches.

 

Vertical connectors

Yamaichi Electronics has developed the vertical connectors needed to enable the design.

Cole points out that, unlike a horizontal connector, a vertical one uses equal-length contacts. This is not the case for a flat connector, resulting in performance degradation since a set of contacts has to turn and hence has a longer length.

Cole showed the simulated performance of an OSFP vertical connector with an insertion loss of over 70GHz.

"The loss up to 70GHz demonstrates the vertical connector advantage because it is low and flat for all the leads," says Cole. "So this [design] is 200-gigabit ready."  

He also showed a vertical connector for the OSFP-XD with a similar insertion loss performance.

Also shown was a comparison with results published for Twinax cables. Cole says this indicates that the loss of a three-inch PCB trace is less than the loss of the cable.

"We've dramatically reduced the RF maximum length, so we had solved the RF roadblock problem, and we maintain the cost-benefit of horizontal line cards," says Cole.

The I/O densities may be unchanged, but it preserves the mature technology's benefits. "And then we get a dramatic improvement in cooling because there are no obstructions to airflow," says Cole.

Vladimir Kozlov, CEO of the market research firm, LightCounting, wondered in a research note whether the vertical design is a distraction for the industry gearing up for co-packaged optics.

"Possibly, but all approaches for reducing power consumption on next-generation switches deserve to be tested now," said Kozlov, adding that adopting co-packaged optics for Ethernet switches will take the rest of the decade.

"There is still time to look at the problem from all angles, literally," said Kozlov

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>